On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: > Hi, Jonathan and Greg > > On 9/1/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 08/29/13 22:32, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> The following changes since commit d8dfad3876e4386666b759da3c833d62fb8b2267: > >>> > >>> Linux 3.11-rc7 (2013-08-25 17:43:22 -0700) > >>> > >>> are available in the git repository at: > >>> > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-fixes-for-3.11d > >>> > >>> for you to fetch changes up to 947b8ec78610fdfd891da249629f79cfa8e5da57: > >>> > >>> iio: at91: fix adc_clk overflow (2013-08-29 21:42:11 +0100) > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> 4th round of fixes for IIO in the 3.11 series. > >>> > >>> Another one patch pull request, this one for an overflow issue that > >>> can occur in the at91 adc driver. > >> How "necessary" is this for 3.11? > >> Is it something that a user can hit today? > > The overflow only happened when user use a very high adc clock with a > big start-up time. > And our default start-up time in DTS is a low value (40ns). So I think > it is rare case. > > >> Is it a regression from 3.10? > > No. > > >> Is it for a new driver? > > No. > > > No > >> It's really late in the 3.11 cycle for me to want to send anything to > >> Linus except for "this fixes a major issue" type patches. Can we just > >> tag this for stable and have it show up in 3.11 after 3.12-rc1 is out? > > Fine by me - have cc'd Josh and Maxime as they should be able to answer > > the above better than me. > > So I am fine with this. What ever happened with this, did I forget to pull them in, or Jonathan, did you redo them in the last set of patches you sent to me? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
