On 7/16/2013 7:16 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:30 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
[...]
After a further thinking of this, maybe remove the adc_op_clk is
better since it is a fake clock, and only used to specify the clock
rate.
To specify the clock rate use a dt property or platform data
parameter is better.
No, to specify *any* clock, the common clock framework is the better
solution.
Yep, this patch is not the right approach. It's trying to work around the
limitations of the platforms clock API implementation. Please fix the at91
clock implementation instead (e.g. by switching to the common clock framework).
Thank you and Maxime for the clarify. I will drop this patch in next
version.
Just FYI. The at91 clock common framework is in implementation by Boris
Brezillion.
- Lars
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
