On 07/16/2013 12:30 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: [...] >> After a further thinking of this, maybe remove the adc_op_clk is >> better since it is a fake clock, and only used to specify the clock >> rate. >> To specify the clock rate use a dt property or platform data >> parameter is better. > > No, to specify *any* clock, the common clock framework is the better > solution. Yep, this patch is not the right approach. It's trying to work around the limitations of the platforms clock API implementation. Please fix the at91 clock implementation instead (e.g. by switching to the common clock framework). - Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
