Dear Hector Palacios,
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 07/19/2013 06:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Hector Palacios,
> >
> >> Dear Marek,
> >>
> >> On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> @@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
> >>>>
> >>>> #define LRADC_RESOLUTION 12
> >>>> #define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION)
- 1)
> >>>>
> >>>> -/*
> >>>> - * Raw I/O operations
> >>>> - */
> >>>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> >>>>
> >>>> const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> >>>> int *val, int *val2, long m)
> >>>>
> >>>> {
> >>>>
> >>>> struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >>>> int ret;
> >>>>
> >>>> - unsigned long mask;
> >>>> -
> >>>> - if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> >>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>> -
> >>>> - /* Check for invalid channel */
> >>>> - if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> >>>> - return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
> >>
> >> You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right? Yeah, I think I had resolved
> >> that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
> >> The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on a
> >> different patch.
> >
> > I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied
> > already.
>
> Where exactly? It's not fixed in Jonathan's fixes-togreg branch, at least.
> Did you fixed it?
I use linux-next [1], should be it.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
next.git/log/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
