Hi Marek,
On 07/19/2013 06:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Hector Palacios,
Dear Marek,
On 07/19/2013 04:30 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
@@ -228,39 +230,12 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
#define LRADC_RESOLUTION 12
#define LRADC_SINGLE_SAMPLE_MASK ((1 << LRADC_RESOLUTION) - 1)
-/*
- * Raw I/O operations
- */
-static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
+static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
int *val, int *val2, long m)
{
struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
int ret;
- unsigned long mask;
-
- if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* Check for invalid channel */
- if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
- return -EINVAL;
This was already resolved, so this patch won't apply I'm afraid.
You mean the 'unsigned long mask', right? Yeah, I think I had resolved
that one before submitting, but looks like I didn't.
The other check is not resolved afaik. We agreed to remove it, but on a
different patch.
I mean the other check, yeah. A patch removing that should be applied already.
Where exactly? It's not fixed in Jonathan's fixes-togreg branch, at least.
Did you fixed it?
Best regards,
--
Hector Palacios
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
