> Patches 2,3,4 and 5 all applied. I would really appreciate to get an ACK from > the i2c folks for patch #4. I'll try to have a look this week. It fell a bit off because linux-i2c was not in CC. I do wonder about the naming, though. VIPERBOARD is probably the board name, but not the IP core/SoC name? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
