On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > I am pretty happy with the whole series now, so next question from > > my end is what route this takes into the kernel? > > > > Patch 1 should go through the IIO tree (as it touches > > a fairly high churn area of the IIO core). > > > > 2-4 are very much in HID... > > 5-9 very much IIO. > > > > My personal preference is to take the lot though the IIO tree > > but then I know we have a few patches in the pipeline that will > > touch this driver after it merges (internal api changes) and have > > no idea what is going on from the HID side so naturally I full on > > the side of least work for me :) > > > > Jiri what are you thoughts on this series? > > > > CC'd Greg given he's the one who will get the fishy pull request > > from me if it goes though IIO... > > If Jiri says it is ok, that's fine with me, whatever works easier for > you two. I just sent some feedback to Srinivas. After that is handled, I am OK with adding my signoff to the patches creating the HID infrastructure and having it pushed through Greg. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
