On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:34:39PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > I am pretty happy with the whole series now, so next question from > my end is what route this takes into the kernel? > > Patch 1 should go through the IIO tree (as it touches > a fairly high churn area of the IIO core). > > 2-4 are very much in HID... > 5-9 very much IIO. > > My personal preference is to take the lot though the IIO tree > but then I know we have a few patches in the pipeline that will > touch this driver after it merges (internal api changes) and have > no idea what is going on from the HID side so naturally I full on > the side of least work for me :) > > Jiri what are you thoughts on this series? > > CC'd Greg given he's the one who will get the fishy pull request > from me if it goes though IIO... If Jiri says it is ok, that's fine with me, whatever works easier for you two. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
