On 11/29/2011 01:02 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > As I am working on the hardware triggers part of the AT91 ADC driver, > I'm wondering what is the plan for the second part of moving iio out of > staging. Right now I'm waiting for a quiet moment to push through large namespace movements for the staging tree so that we can get the version not in staging after staging-next in linux-next. There's too much churn in the staging tree to make it feasible any other way that I can think of. > > Obviously, you will wait for the first patchset to get included, but > what are you planning to move next ? Plan is to move buffers next. The sticking point is getting time to finish writing the stuff to allow push in kernel users. I have a version that works, but haven't had a chance to clean it up. > > I don't find the mail, but I recall you telling that the next batch will > probably move triggers and buffers (or at least only kfifo), do I recall > correctly ? Yup. ring_sw is a dodgy bit of code I wrote a long time ago and have never been happy with so unless someone else works on it, I'm inclined to leave that behind! > > Also, do you have some kind of estimate on when we could begin to have > the next patchset ? I'm running very low on time at the moment due to family bits and job getting in the way so can't really commit to a date I'm afraid. I'm very much open to anyone else offering to take over some of the move out of staging. Mostly it's just cut and paste stuff with the odd name change. Still the recent buffer cleanups need to go in first and a couple more bits in my tree. I'll post those as a work in progress shortly. Jonathan > > Thanks, > Maxime > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
