On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:46:04PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > I guess an actual implementation would have wrappers for doing the > > indirections rather than having users peer into the ops table directly? > Yup, for some reason the cover letter seems to have detached from this. > It suggested exactly that. There may be weird cases where peering this > deep into the ops makes sense, but not for something like this one. Oh, right. As a general rule I don't read cover letters for single patches until after I've read the patch, generally they're either completely content free (if only by virtue of repeating the changelog) or there's a problem with the changelog in the actual patch not explaining what's going on. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
