On 11/12/10 17:10, matthias wrote: > 2010/10/14 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On 10/14/10 11:59, matthias wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2010/10/14 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On 09/29/10 17:50, matthias wrote: >>>>> Hi Jonathan, >>>>> >>>>> just FYI, I've not too much time right now, but did a quick test with >>>>> commenting the bit_per_words statements in read/write. >>>>> The driver seems to work. >>>>> So at least some good news. >>>>> >>>> Given your spi fix is now in, are you happy to ack this patch? >>> >>> I still have some issues, but I found yesterday. But I'm not sure, >>> maybe the source is my board. >>> I have three adis16255 gyros on my board. >>> I'm only able to load the iio driver once, the second time it fails in >>> the second and sometimes on the third gyro inside the >>> adis16260_check_status routine (the status register indicates a SPI >>> error). >>> In my driver sometimes I'm not able to read the scaling register in >>> the right manner, which means the chip does not return the default >>> value. >>> >>> Just let me see, if I can fix this. I'll try to do finish it this >>> week, but it will be critical to do so. >> That would be great. Sounds like something very strange is going on. >> Good luck with the debugging. >>> >>>> Also what do you want to do about your driver in staging? >>> >>> I'd prefer to let it in the staging directory until I'm sure the iio >>> implementation works fine. Then we can delete it. >> Agreed. We definitely want to hold off whilst there are things that >> work in your driver but not the IIO one. >>> >>>> Would be nice to clean this up before the merge window. >>> >>> Do you known, when the next merge window will be? >> 3 months typically. >>> Because I also have a barometer driver (bmp085 from bosch sensortec) >>> which I'd like to bring into the iio subsystem. >> Excellent. I had a look at those a while back for a project, but we >> never added a pressure sensor. Nice looking bit of kit. >>> But up to now I'm not >>> so familiar with all the defines, trigger, ring implementation. So >>> maybe we leave that for the next merge window. >> Sounds sensible. From our point of view, I think most developers now >> work off the staging-next tree anyway (as there is still a fair bit of >> core work going on) so the driver will be 'available' from whenever Greg >> pulls the patch set (typically a couple of days) >> >> Looking forward to that pressure driver and any feedback on the gyro >> patches. > > Acked by Matthias Brugger <mensch0815@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, I'll rebase the set against the current tree and send on to Greg. > > The problems I had was due to the strange pcb layout we have... Ouch. Is it anything remotely general that we might want to add a work around for or some documentation to the driver? Jonathan > > Best regards, > Matthias > >> >> Don't worry too much about the merge window time scales. It's just me >> in my role as 'maintainer' hustling things along :) >> >> Jonathan >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matthias >>> >>>> >>>> Jonathan >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Matthias >>>>> >>>>> 2010/9/29 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>> Hi Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> Lots of additional cc's as I think I know what the problem is and I >>>>>> think it's an spi issue rather than an IIO one. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> after a long stuggle, I got a working kernel version for my board >>>>>>> running as I need it. >>>>>>> I tried both the staging/adis16255 and the staging/iio/gyro driver. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The latter doesn't work. >>>>>>> "adis16260 spi1.1: problem when reading 16 bit register 0x34 >>>>>>> iio device0: disable irq failed" >>>>>> That is the first actual comms with the chip, so it is likely to be a >>>>>> general issue rather than due to that particular call. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A quick look in the code of staging/adis16255 and the data sheet tells >>>>>>> me, that you have to read from the higher register address but we read >>>>>>> from the lower one. >>>>>>> So I changed the value to 0x35, but it doesn't work either. >>>>>> Quoting from the data sheet (it is present on the sheets for both chips). >>>>>> >>>>>> "Each register has two addresses (upper, lower), but either one can be used >>>>>> to access its entire 16 bits of data." >>>>>> >>>>>> It could be there is something special about that register I'm not seeing >>>>>> though... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well in the end I copied "my" read version from staging/adis16255 and >>>>>>> put a read call in the probe function (because it is the easiest way >>>>>>> to get spi_device structure). >>>>>>> Then it seems to work, with higher and lower byte. >>>>>> Ok, that gives us something to work against which is very helpful! >>>>>>> So my conclusion is, that something went wrong when you casacade and >>>>>>> discascade (sorry for the poor english), from spi_device through >>>>>>> adis16260_state to device. >>>>>>> Sounds stange to me, as it works with the adis16260 chip, right? >>>>>> As far as I know. It's possible something strange happened in a merge >>>>>> at some point though. >>>>>>> So maybe it's because I use avr32 architecture? >>>>>> >>>>>> Having done a bit of digging and made sure that (up to the fact I don't >>>>>> have the part) everything runs normally on my board, I'm beginning to >>>>>> suspect you are correct. There are some subtle differences in the setup >>>>>> between your code and Barry's. >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking about, the avr32's seem to use the atmel_spi driver? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah got it (I think)... >>>>>> >>>>>> In drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c atmel_spi_transfer we have: >>>>>> >>>>>> /* FIXME implement these protocol options!! */ >>>>>> if (xfer->bits_per_word || xfer->speed_hz) { >>>>>> dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "no protocol options yet\n"); >>>>>> return -ENOPROTOOPT; >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> Personally I'd have at least sanity checked if the parameters were trying >>>>>> to change anything before dumping out. Also, surely that's a case for >>>>>> something screaming a little louder given it is an out and out device >>>>>> killing problem? I think the default is 8 bit? I think the reason it >>>>>> is in Barry's driver is a legacy issue to do with the fact that these >>>>>> are actually 16bit transfers pretending to be 8 bits ones... Actually >>>>>> now I look at it, I'm not sure why he didn't use 16 bit ones in that >>>>>> function in the first place! >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure we need it in our drivers, but I'm guessing there may be some >>>>>> spi master driver out there somewhere that defaults to something other than >>>>>> 8 bit? (have vague recollection of seeing an email about this... perhaps >>>>>> someone who plays more with spi bus drivers?) >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I don't know if we should dig deeper. The problem is, that I don't >>>>>>> have too much time to do it... >>>>>> Sorry it is proving such a pain for you to test! >>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> I have cc'd spi people and the atmel_spi maintainer to see what we think >>>>>> is the correct fix for this. For the purposes of this discussion >>>>>> (though it's isn't quite what Matthias is working with) the driver in >>>>>> question is drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_core.c >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks again for testing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2010/9/27 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>> On 09/18/10 16:48, matthias wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Jonathan, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> sorry for not answering yet. I was on vacation and next week I won't >>>>>>>>> be able to test the driver. Will try to do it asap.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm afraid quite a bit has changed over the last few weeks. Feel free to test >>>>>>>> this patch set. The changes since then are merely renames of a couple of >>>>>>>> attributes and a lot of stuff for event handling that doesn't effect this >>>>>>>> driver. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If not, I'm hosting a *temporary* git tree with all my various queued up changes >>>>>>>> at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio_temp.git >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Seems excessive to post this set again until I hear back from you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> p.s. Switched to drivers@xxxxxxxxxx address as that now seems to work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2010/9/18 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>> On 09/06/10 16:16, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mainly a rebase, but a couple of attribute naming fixes as well. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Note I don't have one of these so if anyone could test that would >>>>>>>>>>> be great! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Cameron (2): >>>>>>>>>>> staging:iio:adis16260 add id table support >>>>>>>>>>> staging:iio:adis16260 add suppport for adis16255 and adis16250. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/Kconfig | 8 +- >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260.h | 3 + >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_core.c | 139 ++++++++++++++------ >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_platform_data.h | 19 +++ >>>>>>>>>>> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/gyro.h | 9 ++ >>>>>>>>>>> 5 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_platform_data.h >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whilst I haven't tested these (don't have the hardware) I don't think there >>>>>>>>>> is anything controversial, so my intent is to push these to Greg before the >>>>>>>>>> next merge window. This is primarily to remove the duplication we currently >>>>>>>>>> have with two drivers that effectively cover the same parts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html