On 07/28/10 12:07, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Sorry about this lot. I clearly missed one big case when build testing > the last series of patches I sent you. Evidently never built them without > buffering enabled. > > Randy Dunlap found these 3 (posted to lkml in the thread, > > mmotm 2010-07-27-14-56 uploaded (staging/iio) > > I know of one remaining issue to do with some pointer arithmetic that won't > work on 64 bit machines that I will try and get fixed shortly. Thanks. With these 3 patches applied, I still have this build warning: In file included from linux-next-20100728/drivers/staging/iio/accel/lis3l02dq_core.c:31: linux-next-20100728/drivers/staging/iio/accel/../ring_sw.h:223: warning: 'struct iio_ring_access_funcs' declared inside parameter list linux-next-20100728/drivers/staging/iio/accel/../ring_sw.h:223: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want > Jonathan Cameron (3): > staging:iio: iio_sw_ring_helper_state - add dummy case for no buffer > builds. > staging:iio:lis3l02dq add a thresh_timestamp field to state for no > ring case > staging:iio:adis1350 add dummy ring functions for no ring build case > > drivers/staging/iio/accel/lis3l02dq.h | 2 ++ > drivers/staging/iio/accel/lis3l02dq_core.c | 14 +++++++------- > drivers/staging/iio/imu/adis16350.h | 8 ++++++++ > drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.h | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
