Re: Do we still need the scsi IPR driver ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/10/2022 04:36, Brian King wrote:
I've made some progress. I was able to dig up the code to move ipr to use error_handler
and have gotten it to compile, but haven't gotten to trying it in the lab yet.

Hmm. In which machines can I find an IPR installed? I could go hunting in our lab, maybe I can locate one and aid testing/development ...
Any Power 9 or older generation PowerVM based system would have an IPR installed as the boot device.
Additionally, on Power 10 systems, ipr SAS controllers are available as an add in card.

However, the SATA support in ipr was only used to attach the onboard SATA DVD. Power 8 systems were
the last generation of systems that had an onboard SATA DVD. So, to do any testing with a
SATA DVD, you'd need a Power 8 or older system.

Right now I have a patch that removes the SATA support from ipr completely and a patch that changes
to use the error_handler libata support. The one that changes to use the error_handler libata API
adds a bit of complexity for a function that should have few or no users that would need this support
on a current upstream kernel, since only Power 8 and older systems use this support. I'm getting
a system setup to try out both patches, but at this point I'm leaning towards the patch that
removes the libata dependency from ipr.

Hi Brian,

I was just wondering did you ever get to test these patches you mention? Or any other update on this topic?

Thanks,
John



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux