On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:29:22PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:20:54PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > Hello > > > > With Moeicenowy's agreement, I have take leadership ot this patchset. > > > > There are no really changes appart renaming struct quirck to variant. > > > > Since the last serie is really old, I will answer comment here. > > The two regulator (1.2 and 2.5V) are not for the PHY since: > > - nothing in the schematic said that they are for the PHY, they seems > > only for controller > > - all other AHCI driver use 5V for the target/PHY (vs 1.2/2.5 which > > cannot be used for target) > > That's a pretty bad thing to do, especially for old series. You just > dropped all the context that you reply to, and there's no way for any > reviewer to tell if your answers make any kind of sense, or addresses > any question one might have had. > I apologize, i feared to hack a mail with the messageid. Next time I will > > Furthermore, the AHCI binding support only one regulator per PHY, so > > using the "target" regulator is out of question for registring this two > > non-phy regulator. > > Nothing is "out of question", we have the source code and can change > it if needed. > Ok, I will try with a generic AHCI platform solution. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html