On Mon 2017-05-08 13:43:03, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > What I was trying to point out was that storage people try to treat > > SSDs as HDDs... and SSDs are very different. Harddrives mostly survive > > powerfails (with emergency parking), while it is very, very difficult > > to make SSD survive random powerfail, and we have to make sure we > > always powerdown SSDs "cleanly". > > We do. > > The issue raised is that some SSDs still increment the unexpected > power loss count even after clean shutdown sequence and that the > kernel should wait for some secs before powering off. > > We can do that for select devices but I want something more than "this > SMART counter is getting incremented" before doing that. Well... the SMART counter tells us that the device was not shut down correctly. Do we have reason to believe that it is _not_ telling us truth? It is more than one device. SSDs die when you power them without warning: http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html What kind of data would you like to see? "I have been using linux and my SSD died"? We have had such reports. "I have killed 10 SSDs in a week then I added one second delay, and this SSD survived 6 months"? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
