Re: pata_atiixp regression in 4.11-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Tejun

On 28/03/2017, Tejun Heo wrote:
> One way or the other, there's a reported case of secondary port being
> used, so we can't mark it dummy no matter what the datasheet says.  If
> whether the port is marked dummy or not matter much, we can try to do
> finer grained blacklisting or try to do something smarter.

The best option is just not to check the SB7xx series (patch to follow), as
AMD added this ability to these chips.

This is my bad, I thought the early SB700 docs I had were correct - sorry.

Regards
Darren

PS I've adjusted my mailer settings, hopefully this one will work.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux