Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci_platform: Add ACPI support for APM X-Gene AHCI controller v3 hardware.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Graeme Gregory <gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:31:38PM -0700, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Suman Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 5:44:00 PM CEST suman-tripathi wrote:
> > >> > This patch adds ACPI support for APM X-Gene AHCI controller in
> > >> > ahci_platform driver for v3 hardware. APM X-Gene AHCI controller
> > >> > v3 hardware is fully compliant with ahci_platform driver and requires
> > >> > no workaround quirk.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxx>
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c |    1 +
> > >> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >> >
> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > >> > index 62a04c8..3395baf 100644
> > >> > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > >> > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > >> > @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
> > >> >
> > >> >  static const struct acpi_device_id ahci_acpi_match[] = {
> > >> >         { ACPI_DEVICE_CLASS(PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SATA_AHCI, 0xffffff) },
> > >> > +       { "APMC0D33", 0},
> > >> >         {},
> > >> >  };
> > >> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ahci_acpi_match);
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Doesn't the ACPI_DEVICE_CLASS entry take care of this? I thought it had been
> > >
> > >
> > > yeah it also works. Just thought that we need something different as
> > > our's is a non-PCI SATA.
> >
> > Are you suggesting to introduce a new class ACPI_DEVICE_CLASS for
> > non-pci ahci ? or to reuse the existing PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SATA_AHCI ?
>
> This was discussed when AMD Seattle SoC had the same issue and it was
> decided in standards body and on LKML that using PCI device classes for
> non PCI devices was fine.
>
> Example from Overdrive DSDT
>
> Device (AHC0)
> {
>   Name (_HID, "AMDI0600")  // _HID: Hardware ID
>   Name (_UID, 0x00)  // _UID: Unique ID
>   Name (_CCA, 0x01) // _CCA: Cache Coherency Attribute
>   Name (_CLS,
>     Package (0x03) // _CLS: Class Code
>     {
>       0x01,
>       0x06,
>       0x01
>     })


Got it. Will do the same. Thanks !!
>
>   ...
>
> Graeme
>



-- 
Thanks,
with regards,
Suman Tripathi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux