On 27/05/2016 20:15, Andy Gross wrote: > On 27 May 2016 at 11:56, Mason wrote: > >> How come there are so few phy drivers in drivers/phy if most >> devices would typically require one? > > Short answer is that the generic phy framework is fairly recent > (~3 years old). A lot of phys are stuck off in other places like > drivers/usb/phy. At least that's my take on it. <confused> Where did the SATA phy drivers use to live? $ find -name phy ./drivers/usb/phy ./drivers/phy ./drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy ./drivers/net/phy ./drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy ./include/linux/phy ./include/dt-bindings/phy ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy ./Documentation/phy drivers/ata/ahci.h mentions SATA phy registers. Is AHCI standardized to the point that platform-specific PHYs are not required? Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
