On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:02:05 Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
> Hence, I find the original binding simpler and easier to understand when looking at the hardware manual
>
> + uctl@118006c000000 {
> + compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl";
> + reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>;
> + ranges; /* Direct mapping */
> + dma-ranges;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + sata: sata@16c0000000000 {
> + compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci";
> + reg = <0x16c00 0x00000000 0x0 0x200>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>;
> + interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */
> + };
> + };
>
> Is it possible to let this example go in as is?
>
I don't have the hardware manual, so I'm just guessing what the hardware
looks like. If the manual describes the device as a bridge with a 1:1 mapping,
then your existing example above absolutely makes sense.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
