On Wednesday 03 February 2016 14:44:32 Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote: > > Possible in the example. > > I'll update the example to > > uctl@118006c000000 { > compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl"; > reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>; > ranges; /* Direct mapping */ > dma-ranges; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <2>; > > sata: sata@0 { > compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci"; > reg = <0x16c00 0x00000000 0x0 0x200>; > interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>; > interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */ > }; > }; Sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant is uctl@118006c000000 { compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl"; reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>; ranges = <0 0x16c00 0x00000000 0xffffffff>; dma-ranges; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; sata: sata@0 { compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci"; reg = <0x00000000 0x200>; interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>; interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */ }; }; However, I realized that this would break the dma-ranges, if the child device is indeed 64-bit DMA capable. When #address-cells and/or #size-cells don't match between parent and child, you have to provide non-empty ranges as well as dma-ranges, and the dma-ranges for #address-cells=<1> would imply only supporting 32-bit DMA. It could still be uctl@118006c000000 { compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl"; reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>; ranges = <0 0 0x16c00 0x00000000 1 0>; dma-ranges; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; sata: sata@0 { compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci"; reg = <0 0 0x200>; interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>; interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */ }; }; to have a ranges property that shows we are only translating one 4GB segment of MMIO addresses into the child, but that the child has DMA access to the entire CPU address space (including 64-bit wide RAM as well as all MMIO). Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html