Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Julian Margetson <runaway@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On 12/20/2015 1:11 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>> Julian Margetson <runaway@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> [ 48.769671] ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED
>>
>> Well, that didn't help. I still think it's part of the problem, but
>> something else must be wrong as well. The various Master Select fields
>> look like a good place to start.
>
> Master number (which is here would be either 1 or 0) should not affect
> as long as they are connected to the same AHB bus (I would be
> surprised if they are not).
I think they are not. The relevant part of the block diagram for the
460EX looks something like this:
+-----+
| CPU |
+-----+
|
+---------------+
| BUS |
+---------------+
| |
+-----+ +-----+
| DMA | | RAM |
+-----+ +-----+
|
+------+
| SATA |
+------+
The DMA-SATA link is private and ignores the address, which is the only
reason the driver can possibly work (it's programming a CPU virtual
address there).
>> Also, the manual says the LLP_SRC_EN
>> and LLP_DST_EN flags should be cleared on the last in a chain of blocks.
>> The old sata_dwc driver does this whereas dw_dma does not.
>
> Easy to fix, however I can't get how it might affect.
>From the Atmel doc:
In Table 17-1 on page 185, all other combinations of LLPx.LOC = 0,
CTLx.LLP_S_EN, CFGx.RELOAD_SR, CTLx.LLP_D_EN, and CFGx.RELOAD_DS are
illegal, and causes indeterminate or erroneous behavior.
Most likely nothing happens, but I think it ought to be fixed. In fact,
I have a patch already.
Come to think of it, I have an AVR32 dev somewhere. Maybe I should dust
it off.
--
Måns Rullgård
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
