On 12/19/2015 1:05 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, I've found something. The dma setup errors are benign, caused by
the driver calling dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() even for non-dma
operations.
I suppose the following is a quick fix to avoid preparing descriptor
for non-DMA operations (not tested anyhow)
a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
@@ -1041,6 +1041,9 @@ static void sata_dwc_qc_prep_by_tag(struct
ata_queued_cmd *qc, u8 tag)
__func__, ap->port_no, get_dma_dir_descript(qc->dma_dir),
qc->n_elem);
+ if (!is_slave_direction(qc->dma_dir))
+ return;
+
desc = dma_dwc_xfer_setup(qc);
if (!desc) {
dev_err(ap->dev, "%s: dma_dwc_xfer_setup returns NULL\n",
I already have a better patch sitting here.
The real error is the lock recursion that's reported
later. I wasn't seeing it since I was running a UP non-preempt kernel.
With lock debugging enabled, I get the same error. This patch should
fix it.
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ap->host->lock, flags);
hsdevp->cmd_issued[tag] = cmd_issued;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ap->host->lock, flags);
+
This will create a second empty line, though I don't care it is so minor.
The patch leaves one blank line before the following block comment. I
think it looks better that way.
Still can't get the patch applied .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
