On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:32:08PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > On 03/14/2014 10:25 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: > > On 03/14/2014 08:58 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:46:09PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > >>> If ACPI handle for an ATA device is NULL, we shouldn't call > >>> ata_dev_get_GTF as that function will use handle to do some ACPI > >>> evaluation. > >> > >> This caused a crash, right? Can you please include what can trigger > >> such oops and how it looks like and reference to the original bug > >> report. In general, when you're cc'ing stable, please try to provide > >> as much information about the bug as possible so that downstreams have > >> easier time evaluating the importance and risk of the change. The > >> same goes for the previous patch. > > > > For the 1/3 patch, no crash either. It's just that if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > is not set, ZPODD will not function so building it doesn't make sense. > > No bug report for this either, I realized this when I'm preparing a test > build for !CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and found that I can still select ZPODD. Both aren't really -stable material then, right? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html