On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:49:55AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Wednesday 05 February 2014 10:44 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Kishon, > > > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> The common clock framework considers NULL a valid clock > >> reference. This makes handling optional clocks simple, in that if the > >> optional clock is not available, a NULL reference can be used in the > >> place of a real clock, simplifying the clock consumer. > >> > >> Extend this concept to the phy consumer API. A NULL can be passed to > >> the release calls, the phy_init() and phy_exit() calls, and > >> phy_power_on() and phy_power_off() and a NOP is performed. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > >> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> v2 > >> No change. > >> v4 > >> combine !phy and IS_ERR(). > >> Add Tested-by > >> --- > >> Documentation/phy.txt | 6 ++++++ > >> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > >> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Looking over the overall diffstat (there isn't one, Andrew, please don't > > forget the coverletter in the future), this series is predominately > > changing the phy subsystem. However, since it's fixing a boot failure > > in the arm-soc bootfarm, we'd like to get it into our tree without > > pulling in a bunch of unnecessary changes (eg by pulling in -rc2 or > > -rc3). > > > > Could you create a topic branch with this series in it we could base off > > of? Or, could you Ack it so we could take it through arm-soc? > > I can just ACK it so you can take it through your tree. Thanks! Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
