On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 06:38:38AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:48:50AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > @@ -126,7 +151,7 @@ static void ahci_put_clks(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> > static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > - struct ahci_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> > + const struct ahci_platform_data *pdata = ahci_get_pdata(dev);
>
> Let's please not add const. For data types which are known to be
> terminal, const more or less works, I suppose but for anything even
> mildly complicated it ends up being more of a headache. C just
> doesn't have enough language support to make const actually useful.
> e.g. now if somebody wants to add an accessor to ahci_platform_data()
> which is applicable to both readers and writers, we either need two
> separate accessors for const and !const paths or have to cast away
> const.
I don't see anything wrong with this. Platform data should _never_ be
written to, because doing so will change the driver behaviour between
bindings. It really should be read-only to driver code.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
