On Wednesday 15 January 2014 13:08:47 Loc Ho wrote: > >> >> +- clocks : Reference to the clock entry. > >> >> +- phys : PHY reference with parameter 0. > >> > > >> > The specific value of the phy-specifier shouldn't matter to this > >> > binding. What should matter is what it logically corresponds to. > >> > >> I not quite following this. Are you suggest that I drop the value 0. > >> In the binding, one needs to specify the mode of operation - 0 is for > >> SATA. Can you explain more? > > > > The SATA device should not care what the argument for the PHY > > device is. You could connect the same device to another PHY > > that has a different set of arguments, which is the whole point > > of abstracting it. > > > > I understand what you wrote here. We should not have an argument from > the host controller. Then my question is how should the PHY node > indicates that it needs to be configured itself as an SATA PHY? The "phys" property should specify whatever the configuration of the phy device is supposed to be. It's just not the business of the sata driver or the sata binding to know what that configuration is. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
