Re: [PATCH/RESEND v2 1/2] Hard disk S3 resume time optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Todd.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:30:26PM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote:
> Ahh, sorry, yea I think async should work for the entire resume pathway. Would
> you be willing to accept this ata patch separately from the scsi one? It
> wouldn't provide any performance benefit on its own, but would pave the way
> for performance benefit by removing the ATA resume lag time (Which would then
> put the ball in the scsi layer's court to finish the optimization). I've 
> tested both patches separately and both work without issue. Also, this patch
> appears to be a pre-requisite to both mine and Phillip Susi's solution, so 
> it would really hope move things along regardless of which direction is
> ultimately chosen in the SCSI layer.

Let's do it together.  It's not like this involves huge number of
patches which would be helped by staging things.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux