Hello, Todd. On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:30:26PM -0800, Todd E Brandt wrote: > Ahh, sorry, yea I think async should work for the entire resume pathway. Would > you be willing to accept this ata patch separately from the scsi one? It > wouldn't provide any performance benefit on its own, but would pave the way > for performance benefit by removing the ATA resume lag time (Which would then > put the ball in the scsi layer's court to finish the optimization). I've > tested both patches separately and both work without issue. Also, this patch > appears to be a pre-requisite to both mine and Phillip Susi's solution, so > it would really hope move things along regardless of which direction is > ultimately chosen in the SCSI layer. Let's do it together. It's not like this involves huge number of patches which would be helped by staging things. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
