On 06/21/2013 11:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 08:55 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: >> On 06/20/2013 07:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> Hello. >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your comments. >> >>> >>> On 20-06-2013 6:26, Aaron Lu wrote: >>>> >>>> +void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host) >>>> +{ >>>> + int i; >>>> + >>>> + for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) { >>>> + struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i]; >>>> + acpi_handle handle; >>>> + struct ata_device *dev; >>>> + >>>> + if (!ap) >>>> + continue; >>>> + >>>> + handle = ata_ap_acpi_handle(ap); >>>> + if (handle) { >>>> + /* we might be on a docking station */ >>>> + register_hotplug_dock_device(handle, >>>> + &ata_acpi_ap_dock_ops, ap); >>> >>> Please indent this line under the next character after ( above. >> >> Is there a link about this rule? I might have missed something about >> coding style. > > The rule is follow the coding style in the file, unless there's > something really wrong with it (which there might be in the case of > really old drivers). The reason is that a mixture of coding styles > makes the file much harder to read than a single consistent style. Oh right, that's the rule I missed. Thanks for letting me know. > > In this case, if you look at libata-acpi.c you see all continuation > lines of function calls are aligned with open braces. Indeed. -Aaron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html