Re: [PATCH] libata: remove dead code from libata-acpi.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 21-06-2013 4:55, Aaron Lu wrote:

+void ata_acpi_hotplug_init(struct ata_host *host)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
+		struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i];
+		acpi_handle handle;
+		struct ata_device *dev;
+
+		if (!ap)
+			continue;
+
+		handle = ata_ap_acpi_handle(ap);
+		if (handle) {
+			/* we might be on a docking station */
+			register_hotplug_dock_device(handle,
+					&ata_acpi_ap_dock_ops, ap);

     Please indent this line under the next character after ( above.

Is there a link about this rule? I might have missed something about
coding style.

Don't think so. This is a rule in some subsystems like networking, and it's also the way Emacs does such things. So, in principle, you can ignore my comment (although libata seems to also use this style).

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux