On 12-05-03 10:25 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 05/02/2012 03:46 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: >>>>> +static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) >>>> >>>> Return bool?&& maybe split the patch into two - the first separating >>>> out the logic into a function, the latter changing emedia handling? >>> >>> I think the two-liner from v2 is better. >> >> Heh, I don't know. It probably doesn't matter all that much either >> way. Let's let Jeff decide. ;) > > Queued v3. If anyone is motivated to make additional changes, base them on top of v3... Peachy. Thanks, Jeff! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
