Re: ata_eh_link_autopsy: Bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:27:00PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> MMmm.. even that isn't good enough, because the first ATA_QCFLAG_IO test
> bypasses the rest of that logic and triggers unconditional retries.  Ugh.

Hmmm... the unconditional retry on ATA_QCFLAG_IO is intenttional so
that known good requests from FS are guaranteed to be retried no
matter how whacky the underlying device is.  I'm not sure whether that
was a good decision tho.  Maybe we should trust the hardware a bit
more.  So, I'm not necessarily against changing it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux