Hello, On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:53:01AM +0100, Tim Small wrote: > On 08/07/11 05:42, Hubert Bailey wrote: >> The 9125 is a simple controller without a internal processor. The >> 9123 contains an internal processor to enhance RAID 0/1 operations. >> If you are testing in a JBOD configuration you will not take >> advantage of the 9123 internal proces sor. > > OK, that's fine. I have a nice fast CPU in the system which runs the > Linux md code (which I can debug if necessary) with very high > throughput, and it even works across controller cards. A JBOD is what I > want. Yeah, especially for RAID 0/1, there isn't much 'acceleration' to do and with the abundant extra cores and vast amount of main memory these days hardware support for even R5/6 doesn't seem too useful. > Please could you acknowledge that there is actually a problem here? I > don't know whether it's with the 88SE91xx controllers, or with the Linux > AHCI driver (or Linux PMP support), but this is clearly not correct > behaviour. This fault doesn't appear when using a SiI3132, or an > 88SX7042. I don't currently have a different AHCI+FBS capable > controller to double-check against, but may be able to check against an > Intel one in a couple of weeks time. Oh sure, it's not working properly. Looking at the performance numbers you posted for Windows, it seems the Windows driver isn't using FBS either. Larry, Hubert, can you guys please confirm this? Should we blacklist FBS support for some of marvell ahci's? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
