On 08/07/11 05:42, Hubert Bailey wrote: > Tim, > > The 9125 is a simple controller without a internal processor. The 9123 contains an internal processor to enhance RAID 0/1 operations. If you are testing in a JBOD configuration you will not take advantage of the 9123 internal processor. OK, that's fine. I have a nice fast CPU in the system which runs the Linux md code (which I can debug if necessary) with very high throughput, and it even works across controller cards. A JBOD is what I want. > The internal processor can result in lower performance than the 9125. It shouldn't result it complete read failures though, should it? That's what we are seeing on both the 9123, and the 9125 (although the 9123 seems to be worse). Also 130M per second total throughput on a device which should have around 500M per second throughput seems like very low performance to me. If the processor is capable of handling 350M/second+ throughput, then that looks more like a performance bug with the PMP support to me? > However if you configure the drives in a RAID configuration using the 9123 RAID utility you should see better performance than with 9125. > The drives in the machine are using Linux's software RAID6 (26 drives in the machine in total - multiple controllers). The 9123-based cards were selected because they were more readily available and cheaper. Just straight AHCI passthrough is all I want to work here, and the firmware version installed on the 9123 cards I have doesn't support RAID AFAIK, it just does plain AHCI. And going back to the 9125 - the performance with that is unreliable unless you turn off NCQ, and more seriously, sometimes reads are failed entirely. These are the 88SE9125 results again with 2.6.38 and the default Linux NCQ depth of 31, whilst reading a single drive at a time from behind a 3726 PMP: Timing buffered disk reads: 386 MB in 3.00 seconds = 128.59 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 38 MB in 7.01 seconds = 5.42 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: read(2097152) returned 823296 bytes BLKFLSBUF failed: No such device ^^ i.e. a read failure, see the previous emails for the associated kernel error messages Timing buffered disk reads: 328 MB in 3.55 seconds = 92.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 204 MB in 5.30 seconds = 38.48 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 376 MB in 3.01 seconds = 124.78 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 200 MB in 3.01 seconds = 66.53 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 276 MB in 3.01 seconds = 91.68 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 154 MB in 3.36 seconds = 45.81 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 384 MB in 3.01 seconds = 127.45 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 358 MB in 3.01 seconds = 119.03 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 392 MB in 3.00 seconds = 130.65 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 364 MB in 4.33 seconds = 84.11 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 188 MB in 3.01 seconds = 62.44 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 342 MB in 3.01 seconds = 113.47 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 392 MB in 3.01 seconds = 130.39 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 394 MB in 3.01 seconds = 130.76 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 274 MB in 3.91 seconds = 70.16 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 392 MB in 3.00 seconds = 130.50 MB/sec Please could you acknowledge that there is actually a problem here? I don't know whether it's with the 88SE91xx controllers, or with the Linux AHCI driver (or Linux PMP support), but this is clearly not correct behaviour. This fault doesn't appear when using a SiI3132, or an 88SX7042. I don't currently have a different AHCI+FBS capable controller to double-check against, but may be able to check against an Intel one in a couple of weeks time. Thanks, Tim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
