On 03/14/2011 08:01 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 03/07/2011 03:53 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 03/07/2011 09:27 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2011 02:57 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>> On 03/04/2011 06:22 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>>> And if you're highly motivated, a separate patch to update
>>>>> include/linux/ata.h to return bool for obvious ata_id_has_xxx
>>>>> functions
>>>>> would be nice too.
>>>
>>>> Like this?
>>>
>>>> -static inline int ata_id_has_fua(const u16 *id)
>>>> +static inline bool ata_id_has_fua(const u16 *id)
>>>> {
>>>> if ((id[ATA_ID_CFSSE]& 0xC000) != 0x4000)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> return id[ATA_ID_CFSSE]& (1<< 6);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Not _quite_ that easy... one must also s/0/false/ and s/1/true/ where
>>> the return value is explicit, rather than the result of an expression.
>>>
>> Ok, there you go.
>
> looks good, except for the part where it doesn't build ;)
>
Ach, building is _much_ overrated.
Proving with sound mathematical principles that is _must_ work
is much more satisfying.
> Make that micro-fix, and resend as a normal patch, and I'll apply
> straightaway.
>
>
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
