On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As for increased memory usage -- we are talking here only about 10-20k > more. If it really is a problem maybe ata_piix can be redesigned into > ata_generic-style manner so with the help of existing config options > we can keep code size / memory usage on a existing level. s/ata_generic/pata_legacy/ of course -- what I have in mind is making Intel specific code depended on ATA_PIIX and adding new config option ATA_PIIXALIKE for generic code which would be selected by existing PATA_[EFAR,IT8213, OLDPIIX,RADISYS,RDC] options. Thanks, Bartlomiej -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
