Re: PMP and SEMB messages to SEP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 04:07 +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 06:24:15PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:21:46AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Expanders aren't SCSI devices either ... that means they don't
> > > appear as visible to standard SCSI mechanisms like INQUIRY (SMP
> > > isn't a SCSI protocol it's a SAS extension). They just appear as
> > > part of the topology in the device tree.
> 
> > Ah, okay.  Then, things would be much simpler.  I was worrying about
> > how it would map to SCSI layer including INQUIRY emulations and all
> > those stuff.  Thanks for the info.
> 
> So, any thoughts on how and where to add the PMP to the devices
> available for sending SCSI or ATA commands to?
> 
> I'm willing to try to add the required code, but I'm sure I'll
> benefit from a few hints from the experts ...

Well, I'm not sure I'd count as an expert on this piece:  I haven't read
the relevant ATA standards.  From what I understand, SES packets are
encapsulated over an ATA command for SEMB.  In that case, it should be
fairly simple to recognise this and present a SCSI device which simply
encapsulates everything sent to it over this protocol.  That would allow
the ses ULD to attach seamlessly.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux