Re: piix vs ata_piix device ID tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:21 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 04:50:52 +0100
> Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801DB_1 == 0x24c1 (ICH4 device 31 function 1)
> > 
> > piix seems to treat this the same as most other ICH PATA interfaces,
> > which are handled by ata_piix.
> > 
> > Does anyone know why these aren't handled by the libata-based drivers?
> 
> I don't know about 0x24C1 however it isn't listed in the Intel ICH
> programming manual so given we've also had no reports about it I
> suspect it's an error in the PIIX driver ?

Correction, this is a function of the ICH4-L not the ordinary ICH4.  It
is documented in
<http://www.intel.com/assets/pdf/specupdate/290745.pdf>.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux