piix vs ata_piix device ID tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When I converted the Debian kernel configurations over from IDE to
libata-based drivers, I compared the device ID tables for all the PCI
drivers.  I found that ata_piix handles most of the same devices as piix
while pata_oldpiix and pata_mpiix each handle one more.  However, 2
device IDs in piix are not in the device ID tables of any libata-based
driver:

PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371FB_0 == 0x122e (PIIX function 0)

piix seems to treat this the same as PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371FB_1 ==
0x1230, which is handled by pata_oldpiix.  (This is weird; function 0 is
supposed to be the ISA bridge!)

PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801DB_1 == 0x24c1 (ICH4 device 31 function 1)

piix seems to treat this the same as most other ICH PATA interfaces,
which are handled by ata_piix.

Does anyone know why these aren't handled by the libata-based drivers?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux