Hi Bart,
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:34:08 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 03:44:34 pm David Miller wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:19:53 +0100
> >
> > > The commit itself may also have a problem but since it was _never_ in
> > > linux-next tree it never saw a wider upstream testing.
> >
> > This is not true Bart.
>
> Uh? I had verified my claims before writing previous mail..
>
> The patch ("via82cxxx: workaround h/w bugs") appeared in Linus'
> tree on 19th January and it was neither in next-20100101 nor in
> next-20100119.. etc.
That commit first appeared in linux-next in next-20100120 as part of
Dave's ide tree. It was merged into Linus' tree on March 5th (commit
4c10c937cc2eb197db565392db91d429eec71176 "Merge
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide-next-2.6").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgppurohDDbWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
