On Tuesday 19 January 2010 08:48:16 pm David Miller wrote: > From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:42:57 +0300 > > > But shouldn't this just be merged to "ide: use standard timing for > > XFER_PIO_SLOW mode in ide_timing_compute()" since it's the patch that > > introduced that check? > > It's fine either way. > > I can break the ide-next-2.6 tree for everyone by rebasing it to > unwind the 50 or so patches I applied from Bart yesterday to do this, > but really is that pain worth it since right thing is there in the > end? Especially since the new patch is a pure documentation fix in the practice (the old code happens to work fine anyway).. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
