Re: [PATCH 4/5] libata/sff: Use ops->bmdma_stop instead of ata_bmdma_stop()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 16:25 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 04:08 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > In libata-sff, ata_sff_post_internal_cmd() directly calls ata_bmdma_stop()
> > instead of ap->ops->bmdma_stop(). This can be a problem for controllers
> > that use their own bmdma_stop for which the generic sff one isn't suitable
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Oh... that's a scary bug lurking around.  Thanks for catching it.
> 
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Feel free to pick that one up earlier if you want (ie for 2.6.32), as
long as we manage to get it in in 2.6.33 -before- I push powerpc-next to
Linus, I'm happy :-) (or we can have it in both trees).

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux