Re: Thin provisioning fixes (take 3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> writes:

James> So you forgot to specify ordering.  I think the right ordering is
James> that actually, there isn't any.  Jens can take 1, I can take 2,3
James> and Jeff can take 4,5 without running any postmerge trees ... is
James> that correct?

The only dependency is that the sd patch (#2) requires "block: Expose
discard granularity" (86b37281411cf1e9bc0a6b5406c45edb7bd9ea5d) in Jens'
for-2.6.33 tree.

So we will need either a rebase or a postmerge tree.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux