On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:00 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Changes since last kit: > > - Patch 1 (block): Wire up an ioctl that reports whether the > block device zeroes after discard > > - Patch 2 (sd): Tweak max_discard_sectors reporting > > - Patch 3 (scsi, new): Retry temporary TP write errors > > - Patch 4 (libata): No change > > - Patch 5 (libata): Switch to a bytes-in, bytes-out convention > for ata_set_lba_range_entries() to make things more clear > > I think we need a bit R&D wrt. discard coalescing and I doubt > we'll have that ready for the merge window. So I suggest we > stick with the current loop-over-max-discard-sectors approach for > 2.6.32. So you forgot to specify ordering. I think the right ordering is that actually, there isn't any. Jens can take 1, I can take 2,3 and Jeff can take 4,5 without running any postmerge trees ... is that correct? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
