On Thursday 19 November 2009 22:36:50 Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 11/18/2009 01:19 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 15:51:39 Alan Cox wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 8 ++++---- > >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig > >> index f2df6e2..36931e0 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig > >> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ config PATA_HPT366 > >> If unsure, say N. > >> > >> config PATA_HPT37X > >> - tristate "HPT 370/370A/371/372/374/302 PATA support (Experimental)" > >> + tristate "HPT 370/370A/371/372/374/302 PATA support" > >> depends on PCI&& EXPERIMENTAL > >> help > >> This option enables support for the majority of the later HPT > >> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ config PATA_HPT37X > >> If unsure, say N. > >> > >> config PATA_HPT3X2N > >> - tristate "HPT 372N/302N PATA support (Experimental)" > >> + tristate "HPT 372N/302N PATA support" > >> depends on PCI&& EXPERIMENTAL > >> help > >> This option enables support for the N variant HPT PATA > > > > Maybe they are 'stable' but when it comes to features they are behind hpt366 > > (i.e. they lack PCI PM), which is also much cleaner than your drivers, easier > > to understand and much smaller.. > > That sounds like an ACK to Alan's patch, to me ;-) > > A libata driver can be stable, yet not have all the features of drivers/ide. > > That said, I do agree that libata drivers need to have the features > found in the drivers/ide/ drivers. Feel free to add them Mr. Maintainer. :) -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
