On 11/18/2009 01:19 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 15:51:39 Alan Cox wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/Kconfig | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
index f2df6e2..36931e0 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ config PATA_HPT366
If unsure, say N.
config PATA_HPT37X
- tristate "HPT 370/370A/371/372/374/302 PATA support (Experimental)"
+ tristate "HPT 370/370A/371/372/374/302 PATA support"
depends on PCI&& EXPERIMENTAL
help
This option enables support for the majority of the later HPT
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ config PATA_HPT37X
If unsure, say N.
config PATA_HPT3X2N
- tristate "HPT 372N/302N PATA support (Experimental)"
+ tristate "HPT 372N/302N PATA support"
depends on PCI&& EXPERIMENTAL
help
This option enables support for the N variant HPT PATA
Maybe they are 'stable' but when it comes to features they are behind hpt366
(i.e. they lack PCI PM), which is also much cleaner than your drivers, easier
to understand and much smaller..
That sounds like an ACK to Alan's patch, to me ;-)
A libata driver can be stable, yet not have all the features of drivers/ide.
That said, I do agree that libata drivers need to have the features
found in the drivers/ide/ drivers.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
