Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Arjan. > > Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> I think I'm waaaay out of my league in terms of understanding the >> libata structure in the things you are suggesting to be honest, and I >> do not feel I understand enough of the subtleties in this area. > > SCR access is a bit subtle because it requires issuing commands if the > link is behind PMP and internal commands currently assume EH context. > This is true for all link functions, so I'm suggesting the stats > helpers to follow the same convention. This will also make slave link > configuration work properly (controllers which present two SATA links > as master/slave of the same port but still provide access to separate > SCR registers). You know, it's a link function, make it take a link > as all other stuff is designed that way. Oooh... right, I missed that part about exporting to sysfs. It won't show up properly for slave links anyway. Sorry to keep nagging but it's quite uncomfortable for me to see the code go in as-is. ALPM was one thing as it was host specific feature anyway but this is a clearly link level thing being implemented at the port layer. Then again, I agree there isn't any easy solution at this time. So, I don't object to the current implementation. Argh........... Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
