El Tue, 06-10-2009 a las 20:06 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió: > > The early revs of these chips did have a number of errata specific to PCI-X. > > I checked the revision (09) against the sata_mv source and I couldn't > spot anything relevant to us. NEWSFLASH: today we replaced the 4x500GB Seagate drives with 4x1.5TB drives and reconstruction of the array has been running for 2h without a glitch. One interesting difference is that the 500GB drives were being configured in 1.5Gbps SATA mode. Another notable difference is the sequential read speed: ~70MB/s vs ~130MB/s with the 1.5TB model. Could the PCI bus errors be a red herring? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
