On Sun, 3 May 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> You make a good point. There's definitely still work to be done around
> error handling. OTOH, we could always do what IDE does ...
>
> static void idedisk_prepare_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> {
> ide_drive_t *drive = q->queuedata;
> struct ide_cmd *cmd = kmalloc(sizeof(*cmd), GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> /* FIXME: map struct ide_taskfile on rq->cmd[] */
> BUG_ON(cmd == NULL);
Oooh, you're winding me up. Certainly not. Off with the Top Of your Head!
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
