Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
Yeah, that has long been a design decision -- avoid all the mechanics of PIO-Multi, simply because we did not have much of a need for it (and still don't).

Albert Lee worked on PIO-Multi a while ago, which was mainly to get ATA_{12,16} working, IIRC.

But overall, I don't see much of a need to introduce it into the main stack?

I don't see a need - and if we do its more important IMHO to get the PIO
paths out of the irq handlers before doing so.
..

That's not a new concern, given that we *already* perform multi-sector I/O.

And it's not really related to improving the implementation to be better
aware of multi-sector I/O and interaction with EH.

But yeah, a good thing nonetheless.

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux