Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> bit scan). Note that words 64-127 were marked reserved, and must be set 
> to 0 since ATA-1. Have your say please -- do I still need to recast the 
> patch?

"Must be" but were not.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux